Submittal Forms
Current Contests
Recent Contests

CQWW WPX Contest, SSB   2017   Mar 25   Claimed Score

Click on a call below for a list of all the contests for which that call sign is listed as an operator. Click on the [email] link to send an e-mail to the contester who posted the claimed score.

Call: KZ5MM
Operator(s): W5PR
Station: W5PR

Class: SOSB10 HP
QTH: STX
Operating Time (hrs):
Location: USA

Summary:   Compare Scores
BandQSOs
160:
80:
40:
20:
15:
10:
Total:273Prefixes133Total Score92,302

 

Club: Texas DX Society

Comments:     [email]     2017-03-27 08:45:43
Started on 80m Friday night traded #1 with XE2X for the third contest in a row. Thunderstorms knocked me off the air after about 3 hours and 139 QSOs. We had several bands of t-storms coming through so I knew I wouldn't be able to get back on until the next night. I decided to go to the Hamfest Saturday morning and try 10 meters when I got home. First QSO on 10 at 1754 and SA was wide open to here. 1800 hour was 61 Qs so I probably was about 2 hours late to the party. Very few US/VE contacts and all, except locals, were on scatter. No EU or AS at all in this one. One AF and a number of OC, surprisingly enough. YN2KW, the TDXS team in YN called on scatter at 1914. Good work guys! Worked a couple of ZLs at 2027 and 2032, but no more after. I realized I was not going to work any VKs by 2200, but then between 2213 and 2313, I worked 11 VKs, with 8 in a row between 2242 and 2313! Only 3 locals after that. Sunday morning definitely did not start off with a "bang." Sat in the chair cqing for hours until a local mercifully gave me a Q at 1417 and then more than an hour until a couple more locals came around. Finally a LU at 1541. Less than 100 Qs all day Sunday. Ugg! Drat you missing sunspots! CT3 at 2042 and E51 at 2155 were nice on Sunday. Band totally died in the last hour with the final PY at 2325. I wondered if I should have continued on 80, but having a good night's sleep has its merits! I thought about 160, but I figured that, with the mults not counting separately on each band, that there would be no good reason for all bend entrants to spend much time on 160. Evidently 10 saw even less time for them than 160... 160M 80M 40M 20M 15M 10M Total % SA 0 0 0 0 0 189 189 69.2 NA 0 0 0 0 0 69 69 25.3 OC 0 0 0 0 0 14 14 5.1 AF 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.4 160M 80M 40M 20M 15M 10M Total CE 14 14 CT3 1 1 CX 4 4 E5/s 1 1 HC 1 1 HI 1 1 HK 6 6 HP 2 2 HR 1 1 K 56 56 KP4 3 3 LU 40 40 OA 1 1 P4 1 1 PJ4 1 1 PY 116 116 TI 2 2 VK 11 11 XE 3 3 YN 1 1 YV 4 4 ZL 2 2 ZP 1 1 QSO/Pref by hour and band Hour 160M 80M 40M 20M 15M 10M Total Cumm OffTime D1-1700Z - - - - - 9/7 9/7 9/7 53 D1-1800Z - - - - - 61/29 61/29 70/36 D1-1900Z - - - - - 36/16 36/16 106/52 D1-2000Z - - - - - 22/10 22/10 128/62 D1-2100Z - - - - - 43/24 43/24 171/86 D1-2200Z - - - - - 13/5 13/5 184/91 D1-2300Z - - - - - 5/2 5/2 189/93 21 D2-0000Z --+-- --+-- --+-- --+-- --+-- 2/1 2/1 191/94 60 D2-0100Z - - - - - - 0/0 191/94 60 D2-0200Z - - - - - - 0/0 191/94 60 D2-0300Z - - - - - - 0/0 191/94 60 D2-0400Z - - - - - - 0/0 191/94 60 D2-0500Z - - - - - - 0/0 191/94 60 D2-0600Z - - - - - - 0/0 191/94 60 D2-0700Z - - - - - - 0/0 191/94 60 D2-0800Z --+-- --+-- --+-- --+-- --+-- --+-- 0/0 191/94 60 D2-0900Z - - - - - - 0/0 191/94 60 D2-1000Z - - - - - - 0/0 191/94 60 D2-1100Z - - - - - - 0/0 191/94 60 D2-1200Z - - - - - - 0/0 191/94 60 D2-1300Z - - - - - - 0/0 191/94 60 D2-1400Z - - - - - 1/0 1/0 192/94 59 D2-1500Z - - - - - 3/3 3/3 195/97 23 D2-1600Z --+-- --+-- --+-- --+-- --+-- 7/3 7/3 202/100 D2-1700Z - - - - - 5/3 5/3 207/103 D2-1800Z - - - - - 9/5 9/5 216/108 D2-1900Z - - - - - 18/6 18/6 234/114 D2-2000Z - - - - - 14/7 14/7 248/121 D2-2100Z - - - - - 11/8 11/8 259/129 D2-2200Z - - - - - 10/3 10/3 269/132 D2-2300Z - - - - - 4/1 4/1 273/133 Total: 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 273/133